Evdokia Romanova, an LBGT activist from Samara, Russia was charged with “homosexual propaganda” on 26 July for reposting links to the international Youth Coalition for Sexual Reproductive Rights website and to articles that promoted LGBT equality.

On 26 July, LGBT activist Evdokia Romanova, an active member of the Youth Coalition for Sexual and Reproductive Rights (YCSRR) from Samara in Central Russia, was called to her local police station to act as a witness for another case the police were investigating. However, on arrival, she was questioned and charged under Article 6.21, part 2 of the Russian Code of Administrative Offences for “propaganda of non-traditional sexual relationships among minors using the Internet”.

Her trial was meant to be on the 18th of September but has been delayed by 2 weeks by the Magistrates Court to look into her case, If found guilty, she could be fined up to 100,000 roubles (USD 1,750). In violation of the law, Evdokia Romanova was denied legal representation when questioned and charged by the police.

The police also unlawfully refused her and her lawyer access to the case file, denying them a chance to learn the grounds on which she had been charged.

Evdokia Romanova and her lawyer were only able to get access to the case file materials on 5 September, nearly 6 weeks after she was charged, and only after the case had been referred to Kirov District Court in Samara.

Evdokia Romanova’s case file reveals that the charges most likely relate to her membership of the YCSRR and that her “crime” was the reposting of links to the Youth Coalition website and media publications, including a Guardian article on the same-sex marriage referendum in Ireland and a Buzzfeed article on an exhibition in St. Petersburg on Russian LGBT teens, on her personal Facebook and Russian social media network, VKontakte.

Four of the posts date back to 2015 and another to May 2016.

The police deemed links to the YCSRR’s own publication, a campaign calling for youth activists to campaign for LGBT rights, to be the most incriminating and the police Centre for the Prevention of Extremism even ordered two experts – one on linguistics and another on psychology, to conduct an examination of the publication.

Both experts concluded that the publication contained “propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations”, with the one who conducted the linguistic examination concluding it was aimed at “forming nontraditional sexual orientation”, “creating appealing image of non-traditional sexual orientation” and “was forming an image of equal value of traditional and non-traditional sexual relations for society.

Pinksixty will follow this case and update.

 

Source: Amnesty International

Source: Youth Coalition